Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations
Date: 2010-02-11 13:46:45
Message-ID: 4B740A45.4060609@cs.helsinki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2010-02-11 03:44 +0200, I wrote:
> I'm going to have to disappoint a bunch of people and give up. :-(

Btw. would it make sense to apply the WITH-on-top-of-DML part of this
patch? At least to me, this seems useful because you can write a
RECURSIVE SELECT and then use UPDATE .. FROM or DELETE .. USING on that CTE.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-11 13:46:56 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2010-02-11 13:44:18 Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq