| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jayadevan M" <Jayadevan(dot)Maymala(at)ibsplc(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL - case studies |
| Date: | 2010-02-10 15:47:51 |
| Message-ID: | 4B7280C7020000250002F120@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Jayadevan M <Jayadevan(dot)Maymala(at)ibsplc(dot)com> wrote:
> Could some of you please share some info on such scenarios- where
> you are supporting/designing/developing databases that run into at
> least a few hundred GBs of data (I know, that is small by todays'
> standards)?
I'm a database administrator for the Wisconsin Courts. We've got
about 200 PostgreSQL database clusters on about 100 servers spread
across the state. Databases range from tiny (few MB) to 1.3 TB.
Check out this for more info:
http://www.pgcon.org/2009/schedule/events/129.en.html
I hope that helps. If you have any particular questions not
answered by the above, just ask.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-02-10 15:55:03 | Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL - case studies |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-10 15:24:56 | Re: Memory Usage and OpenBSD |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-02-10 15:55:03 | Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL - case studies |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-10 14:56:40 | Re: Deferred constraint and delete performance |