From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |
Date: | 2010-01-28 20:05:32 |
Message-ID: | 4B61EE0C.4090104@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Guys,
> Hmm, I'm sorry but that's bogus. Retaining so much WAL that we are
> strongly in danger of blowing disk space is not what I would call a
> safety feature. Since there is no way to control or restrain the number
> of files for certain, that approach seems fatally flawed. Reducing
> checkpoint_timeout is the opposite of what you would want to do for
> performance.
Which WAL are we talking about here? There's 3 copies to worry about:
1) master WAL
2) the archive copy of WAL
3) slave WAL
--Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-28 20:07:59 | Re: pgsql: Define INADDR_NONE on Solaris when it's missing. |
Previous Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-01-28 20:01:42 | Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl [PATCH] |