From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |
Date: | 2010-01-28 18:40:36 |
Message-ID: | 4B61DA24.2050704@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> How about just making a restore_command copy the WAL files as the
>> normal one (e.g., 0000...) instead of a pg_xlog/RECOVERYXLOG?
>> Though we need to worry about deleting them, we can easily leave
>> the task to the bgwriter.
>
> The reason for doing it that way was to limit disk space usage during
> a long restore. I'm not convinced we can leave the task to the bgwriter
> --- it shouldn't be deleting anything at that point.
That has been changed already. In standby mode, bgwriter does delete old
WAL files when it performs a restartpoint. Otherwise the streamed WAL
files will keep accumulating and eventually fill the disk.
It works as it is, but having a sandbox dedicated for restored/streamed
files in pg_xlog/restored, instead of messing with pg_xlog directly,
would make me feel a bit easier about it. There's less potential for
damage in case of bugs if they're separate.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-28 18:41:35 | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-28 18:37:33 | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |