| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |
| Date: | 2010-01-26 10:36:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4B5EC5C6.1000103@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> *That* makes pg_standby obsolete, not streaming replication per se.
>> Setting standby_mode=on, with a valid restore_command using e.g 'cp' and
>> no connection info for walreceiver is more or less the same as using
>> pg_standby.
>
> I've yet to understand how the files in the archive get from the master
> to the slave in this case, or are you supposing in your example that the
> cp in the restore_command is targetting a shared disk setup or
> something?
Yes. Just like with pg_standby.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-01-26 10:47:10 | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |
| Previous Message | tomas | 2010-01-26 10:32:57 | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |