From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming Replication on win32 |
Date: | 2010-01-24 22:33:39 |
Message-ID: | 4B5CCAC3.7080104@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/21/2010 11:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Joe Conway wrote:
>> OK, so now I see why we want this fixed for dblink and walreceiver, but
>> doesn't this approach leave every other WIN32 libpq client out in the
>> cold? Is there nothing that can be done for the general case, or is it a
>> SMOP?
>
> The problem only applies to libpq calls from the backend. Client apps
> are not affected, only backend modules. If there's any other modules out
> there that use libpq, then yes, those have a problem too.
Sorry for being thick -- I'm still missing something. I don't understand
why any user program using libpq/PQexec running on Windows does not have
the same issue. Or to put it another way, why does this only apply to
libpq calls from backend modules?
> A generic fix would be nice. Putting the wrapper functions in a new
> header file that's included in all backend modules that want to use
> libpq would work. Maybe the new header file could even be #included from
> libpq-fe.h, when compiling backend code (#ifndef FRONTEND), so you
> wouldn't need to modify dblink, walreceiver, or any 3rd party modules
> that use libpq at all.
I'll go ahead and do this if there is consensus for it.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-24 22:36:52 | Re: Streaming Replication on win32 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-01-24 22:29:47 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |