Re: We've broken something in error recovery

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: We've broken something in error recovery
Date: 2010-01-23 20:55:55
Message-ID: 4B5B625B.7000202@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> #4 0x4e85b4 in ExceptionalCondition (
> conditionName=0x1ac4ac "!(nestLevel > 0 && nestLevel <= GUCNestLevel)",
> errorType=0x1abf44 "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x1abee4 "guc.c",
> lineNumber=3907) at assert.c:57
> #5 0x501f48 in AtEOXact_GUC (isCommit=-86 'ª', nestLevel=84) at guc.c:3907
> #6 0x20618c in AbortTransaction () at xact.c:2194
>
>

This looks like maybe a corrupted stack - the args to AtEOXact_GUC at
that location in xact.c are hardwired.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2010-01-23 21:08:35 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-23 20:43:40 We've broken something in error recovery