| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: commit fests |
| Date: | 2010-01-23 01:17:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4B5A4E25.5020308@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Another problem is that it's very debatable whether users (as opposed
> to developers) want a fast release cycle. Some of that reluctance to
> update might dissipate if we had a better upgrade-in-place story, but
> by no means all of it. People don't want to have to retest their
> applications every six months.
>
>
>
Or even more than once every few years. This is a consideration that is
often ignored in our discussions, unfortunately.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-23 02:04:13 | Re: commit fests |
| Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2010-01-23 00:54:16 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |