From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
Date: | 2010-01-21 19:38:56 |
Message-ID: | 4B58AD50.9020807@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Le 21/01/2010 20:31, Dave Page a écrit :
> On 1/21/10, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> Le 21/01/2010 11:57, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
>>>> version.
>>>
>>> Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
>>> to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.
>>>
>>
>> Just saw this. Should we change every 8.5 with 9.0 in pgAdmin's code?
>> That's not a hard work, but it would probably be better to do that right
>> now.
>>
>
> I quite enjoy finding those old references - it's a weird reminder of
> history (and of course, it makes no difference to the operation of the
> code) :-)
>
Sure.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2010-01-21 19:54:58 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 19:31:03 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-01-21 19:52:08 | Re: Application name patch - v3 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 19:31:03 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 |