From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |
Date: | 2010-01-19 19:52:05 |
Message-ID: | 4B560D65.2000001@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis wrote:
>> I'm not convinced that we should start adding syntax helpers like that
>> to psql. For now it is an arbitrary subset of MySQL stuff, are we going
>> to add oracle/db2/mssql/drizzle/mariadb and whatnot later on?
>> Also I can already see people asking "well you already know that this is
>> that command - why not emulate it fully?".
>
> Good points. However, it only takes effect in interactive mode, so I
> don't see it as a promise to do much. I'll make an analogy to:
>
> $ git difff
> git: 'difff' is not a git-command. See 'git --help'.
>
> Did you mean this?
> diff
well the actual output is just:
:~$ git difff
git: 'difff' is not a git-command. See 'git --help'.
which is more or less the same as:
postgres=# \mysql
Invalid command \mysql. Try \? for help.
so I don't really see why we need to add some random second guessing of
what the user actually wanted (and if he is indeed a mysql refugee he
can always use "help" and go on from there).
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-01-19 19:56:23 | Re: lock_timeout GUC patch |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-01-19 19:51:13 | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |