From: | Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches |
Date: | 2010-01-19 08:11:32 |
Message-ID: | 4B556934.6000507@beccati.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Il 18/01/2010 18:42, Magnus Hagander ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 18:31, Matteo Beccati<php(at)beccati(dot)com> wrote:
>> Il 18/01/2010 15:55, Magnus Hagander ha scritto:
>>>
>>> If it wasn't for the fact that we're knee deep in two other major
>>> projects for the infrastructure team right now, I'd be all over this
>>> :-) But we really need to complete that before we put anything new in
>>> production here.
>>
>> Sure, that's completely understandable.
>>
>>> What I'd like to see is one that integrates with our general layouts.
>>
>> Shoudln't bee too hard, but I wouldn't be very keen on spending time on
>> layout related things that are going to be thrown away to due the framework
>> and language being different from what is going to be used on production
>> (symfony/php vs django/python).
>
> I don't know symfony, but as long as it's done in a template it is
> probably pretty easy to move between different frameworks for the
> layout part.
By default symfony uses plain PHP files as templates, but some plugins
allow using a templating engine instead. I guess I can give them a try.
--
Matteo Beccati
Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kurt Harriman | 2010-01-19 08:24:08 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-19 07:48:03 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-19 08:44:01 | Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-18 17:44:28 | Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches |