From: | Joel Alpers <joel(at)jkalpers(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trouble connecting to database using PQconnectdb (C/libpq) |
Date: | 2010-01-17 03:23:37 |
Message-ID: | 4B5282B9.8090406@jkalpers.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joel Alpers <joel(at)jkalpers(dot)com> writes:
>
>> New system: Fedora 11, PostgreSQL 8.4
>>
>
> Fedora 11 enables selinux by default ...
>
>
>> *** Error - Can't connect to database "photodb" - could not connect to server: Permission denied
>> Is the server running on host "192.168.111.7" and accepting
>> TCP/IP connections on port 5432?
>>
>
> Almost certainly, this represents selinux thinking that apache shouldn't
> be making connections to random ports, and denying the socket open long
> before it ever has a chance to get to postgres.
>
> If you poke around in the selinux configuration options you can probably
> find a switch that opens this up, but I don't know offhand what it is.
>
> Or you could disable selinux, but if you're running a publicly visible
> webserver I'd strongly recommend against that. selinux will save your
> bacon someday, but not if it's turned off.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Tom:
Thanks for the quick reply - looks like you were spot on with your analysis.
I temporarily set selinix to "permissive" and the web page works as it
should.
Now the trick will be to find a way to make them play well together -- I'll
check the postgres site where they have discussions archived...
Thanks again!!!
Joel.
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Joel K. Alpers
| Expressive Black and White Images
| http://www.jkalpers.com
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2010-01-17 03:34:33 | Re: Trouble connecting to database using PQconnectdb (C/libpq) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-17 02:21:26 | Re: Read only column ? |