From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication status |
Date: | 2010-01-15 16:55:59 |
Message-ID: | 4B5049BF020000250002E57B@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> In many of the more secure environments I've worked in (finance,
> defense), there is *no* access to the database server beyond what
> comes out of port 5432 without getting a whole separate team of
> people involved. If the DBA can write a simple monitoring program
> themselves that presents data via the one port that is exposed,
> that makes life easier for them.
Right, we don't want to give the monitoring software an OS login for
the database servers, for security reasons.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-15 17:00:32 | Re: Streaming replication, loose ends |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-15 16:50:39 | Re: Streaming replication status |