From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Eduardo Piombino <drakorg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server |
Date: | 2010-01-14 05:36:54 |
Message-ID: | 4B4EAD76.9030305@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm kind of surprised that there are disk I/O subsystems that are so
> bad that a single thread doing non-stop I/O can take down the whole
> server. Is that normal?
No.
> Does it happen on non-Windows operating
> systems?
Yes. My 3ware 8500-8 on a Debian Sarge box was so awful that launching a
terminal would go from a 1/4 second operation to a 5 minute operation
under heavy write load by one writer. I landed up having to modify the
driver to partially mitigate the issue, but a single user on the
terminal server performing any sort of heavy writing would still
absolutely nuke performance.
I landed up having dramatically better results by disabling the
controller's RAID features, instead exposing each disk to the OS
separately and using Linux's software RAID.
> What kind of hardware should I not buy to make sure this
> doesn't happen to me?
3ware's older cards. Apparently their new ones are a lot better, but I
haven't verified this personally.
Anything in RAID-5 without a BBU.
Anything at all without a BBU, preferably.
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-01-14 05:45:05 | Re: performance config help |
Previous Message | Bob Dusek | 2010-01-13 22:37:56 | Re: performance config help |