Re: postgresql 8.1 windows 2008 64 bit

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Schuchardt <d(dot)schuchardt(at)prodat-sql(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql 8.1 windows 2008 64 bit
Date: 2010-01-13 15:58:44
Message-ID: 4B4DEDB4.5000707@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Daniel Schuchardt wrote:
> can anybody give us a hint if we can use that combination?

PostgreSQL 8.1 for Windows became unsupported over two years ago due to
technical issues: http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.865
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy

There were some major infrastructure changes in 8.3, including building
the software using Microsoft's compiler instead of ported UNIX tools,
that make it (or, even better, 8.4) a far better choice.

There is no specific 64-bit port of PostgreSQL yet, one is in progress
for the next version but it's still missing a few things:
http://blog.hagander.net/archives/160-64-bit-Windows-in-PostgreSQL.html

But you can run the regular 32-bit server just fine on the 64-bit
versions, albeit with some concerns about client apps:
http://blog.hagander.net/archives/73-PostgreSQL-vs-64-bit-windows.html

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-13 16:08:35 Re: autovacuum_naptime seems to take minutes for seconds
Previous Message Martin Flahault 2010-01-13 15:15:06 Re: Collate order on Mac OS X, text with diacritics in UTF-8