From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Minimizing disk space |
Date: | 2010-01-08 03:21:13 |
Message-ID: | 4B46A4A9.2010705@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 7/01/2010 11:27 PM, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Heyho!
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 18.26:05 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> ...
>>> With this in mind: what can we tune to minimize diskspace (RAM-disk
>>> space) usage?
>
> [thanks to all for your input!]
>
>> Wow, here are some things but honestly Pg may not be the DB you are
>> looking for.
>
> Well, parts of the code are shared with a server side component, which we
> already ported from Oracle to pg, so licensing costs aside we were hoping
> avoid having to maintain yet another different type of db backend (build up
> know how, ...)
>
> But if using pg won't work, I guess sqlite (or Ingres, which I haven't
> worked with before) would be an alternative. Although, for example with
> SQLite, I'd have to check carefully if we don't need more features than it
> has ...
Firebird is also designed for embedded use.
Pg will work - it just might not be as convenient and easy to use in
that environment. If you're using Pg elsewhere, then it's going to be a
trade-off between the cost of supporting another DB and the work
required to make Pg do what you want.
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-01-08 04:00:17 | Re: After a crash all my tables got wiped, but still using disk space. |
Previous Message | Chris | 2010-01-08 02:22:55 | Re: create table if does not exists |