Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-07 20:49:28
Message-ID: 4B4648D8.2010005@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> [ shrug... ] To me, HS+SR is actual replication, which would justify
> tagging this release 9.0. With only one of them, it's 8.5. I
> understand that there are power users who would find HS alone to be
> tremendously useful, but in terms of what the average user sees, there's
> a quantum difference.
>
>

Right. As someone engaged in the marketplace, I can tell you that IMNSHO
it is almost impossible to overstate the importance of getting both of
these features. We will suffer an enormous loss of face and respect if
we don't.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-01-07 20:53:37 Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-07 20:47:53 Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network