Re: Auto-extending table partitions?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, u235sentinel(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Auto-extending table partitions?
Date: 2010-01-06 19:44:13
Message-ID: 4B44E80D.3020204@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/6/10 9:13 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:06 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:50:25PM -0700, u235sentinel wrote:
>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> Getting full?
>>>>
>>>> ...Robert
>>>>
>>> Ok. Bad analogy. We have the tables setup to write data according
>>> to the month it was loaded. We have a December table, a January
>>> table and so on. Basically following the examples given on the 8.4
>>> web site.

FWIW, our roadmap is to add a 2nd type or partitioning which would be on
the sub-table level and much more automated for that reason.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-06 19:53:45 Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-06 19:43:52 Re: snapshot generation broken again...