From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Date: | 2010-01-04 20:05:48 |
Message-ID: | 4B424A1C.1040001@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> What I should have said, in addition: VFI will be kept as a non-default
>> option, in case it is required. We will document that use of VFI will
>> not work correctly with HS and that its use is deprecated and should be
>> in emergencies only in any case. I will enjoy removing VFI when that
>> eventually occurs, but its not a priority. (And if you think, why keep
>> it? I'll say - how else can we run a VFI - not by a stored proc,
>> certainly).
Isn't there some way we can tell if a server is an HS master, and
prevent VFI from being run?
--Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-01-04 20:07:18 | Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-04 20:03:31 | Re: New VACUUM FULL |