From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication? |
Date: | 2009-12-22 20:46:58 |
Message-ID: | 4B313042.9070103@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> It's needed to find the place where the backup stopped, so it defines
>>> the safe stopping point. We could easily pass that info via WAL, when
>>> streaming. It doesn't actually matter until we try to failover.
>> Right. And, it's also needed to cooperate with HS which begins accepting
>> read-only queries after a recovery reaches that safe stopping point.
>
> Agreed, hence my interest!
Yeah, that's a great idea.
I was just having a chat with Magnus this morning, and he asked if the
current patch already provides or if it would be possible to write a
stand-alone utility to connect to a master and stream WAL files to an
archive directory, without setting up a full-blown standby instance. We
came to the conclusion that backup history files wouldn't be copied as
the patch stands, because the standby has to specifically request them.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-12-22 20:47:14 | Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication? |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-12-22 20:37:23 | Re: Tuplestore should remember the memory context it's created in |