| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(dot)phlo(dot)org(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hiroyuki Yamada <yamada(at)kokolink(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: alpha3 release schedule? |
| Date: | 2009-12-22 17:30:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4B31022F.5040303@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> You've been perfectly happy for *years* with the situation that recovery
> would fail if max_prepared_transactions was not correctly. You're not
> going to tell me you never noticed? Why is avoidance of obvious
> misconfiguration of HS such a heavy priority when nothing else ever was?
That's not a priority, and I never said it was.
It almost sounds like we're in a violant agreement: this issue of
flipping wal_standby_info in the master has nothing to do with the
removal of the capability to start standby from a shutdown checkpoint.
So what *was* the reason? Was there something wrong with it? If not,
please put it back.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-22 17:42:12 | Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-22 17:28:33 | Re: Small change of the HS document |