| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cheapest way to poll for notifications? |
| Date: | 2009-12-19 07:24:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4B2C7FC5.4070201@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
On 11/12/2009 11:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> As for the JDBC driver - it turns out that the documentation is
> out-of-date and/or misleading. The JDBC driver *does* support reading
> notifications the backend has pushed to its receive buffer, and does
> *not* have to poll the backend or issue a statement to receive
> notifications.
Update: The above is true only for non-SSL connections. For SSL
connections you still have to send dummy statements.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-19 07:40:12 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
| Previous Message | Alex - | 2009-12-19 07:14:58 | Re: PL/Perl Performance Problems |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2009-12-19 09:47:59 | Re: Get bytes sent to client |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-12-19 07:00:35 | Cheapest way to poll for notifications? & Driver improvement question re SSL and notify |