Re: Range types

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range types
Date: 2009-12-15 16:20:48
Message-ID: 4B27B760.8030409@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> So the long and the short of it is that next/previous are not
> going to work for string types, maxlength or no maxlength.
>
>
>

Even more importantly, I strongly doubt they would be of the slightest
practical value.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2009-12-15 16:51:25 Re: ECPG patch N+1, fix auto-prepare
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2009-12-15 15:42:34 Re: ECPG patch N+1, fix auto-prepare