Re: new CommitFest states

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new CommitFest states
Date: 2009-12-14 15:36:18
Message-ID: 4B260712020000250002D3EF@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I didn't really get any feedback on my proposal to add a new
> "Discussing review" state

It seems like a good idea to me; it better models the reality.

> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_a_CommitFest

It seems to me that a patch could move from "Discussing review" to
"Needs review" -- if the reviewer decided to discuss the approach
before continuing the review process and the discussion confirms the
approach as viable.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-14 15:49:46 Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-12-14 15:27:37 Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?