| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management |
| Date: | 2009-12-09 03:11:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4B1F154E.6040107@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>> Can I ask the final decision whether the YAML formatter should be
>> applied or rejected? As far as I read the discussion, we can apply it
>> because serveral users want it and we don't have a plan to support
>> extensible formatters in the core.
>>
> The path I thought made sense at this point was to mark the patch
> ready for a committer, since it sounds like everyone is done with it
> now, and have another committer besides yourself do a final review as
> part of that.
That brings us back to where this conversation started ;-) I'll pick it up.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-12-09 03:12:07 | Re: ProcessUtility_hook |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2009-12-09 03:07:34 | Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost] |