Re: YAML

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML
Date: 2009-12-07 21:53:37
Message-ID: 4B1D7961.3010802@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Not everything is sanely convertible into some sort of plugin. A plugin
> mechanism for this would be FAR more trouble that it is worth, IMNSHO.
>
> We are massively over-egging this pudding (as a culinary blogger you
> should appreciate this analogy).

OK, then let's just accept it. It's small, has a maintainer, is useful
to some people, and doesn't create any wierd complications. I think,
given the knowledge that YAML is now a subdialect of JSON it could
potentially be made smaller, but I can't say how at the moment.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

  • Re: YAML at 2009-12-07 19:07:43 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

  • Re: YAML at 2009-12-08 00:07:13 from Andrew Dunstan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-12-07 21:53:44 Exclusion Constraint vs. Constraint Exclusion
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-12-07 20:53:48 Re: Install chapter broken link