Re: CommitFest status/management

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-01 04:17:04
Message-ID: 4B1498C0.6040907@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.
>>
>
> Do we have consensus yet that we want YAML? It seemed, well,
> yet another format without all that much advantage over what's
> there.
>
>
>

I think you and I are the two main skeptics ;-) But we seem to be rather
in the minority, and it's not terribly invasive from what I have seen so
far.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-12-01 04:28:28 Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-12-01 04:11:50 Re: CommitFest status/management