Re: Partitioning option for COPY

From: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Date: 2009-11-23 15:43:24
Message-ID: 4B0AAD9C.1040109@asterdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> I was unaware you were developing these ideas and so was unable to
> provide comments until now.
The first patch was published to this list on September 10 (almost 2.5
months ago) along with the wiki page describing the problem and the
solution.
What should I have done to raise awareness further?

/E

--
Emmanuel Cecchet
Aster Data
Web: http://www.asterdata.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-23 15:49:54 Re: Partitioning option for COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-23 15:35:06 Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update