Re: Union test case broken in make check?

From:	Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:	Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Union test case broken in make check?
Date:	2009-11-19 21:47:36
Message-ID:	4B05BCF8.2090801@dunslane.net
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2009-11-19 21:21:43 from Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>  2009-11-19 21:47:36 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>   2009-11-19 23:39:14 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2009-11-20 00:54:30 from Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com> 📎     2009-11-20 02:27:45 from Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>      2009-11-20 02:52:55 from Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>      2009-11-20 05:49:20 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>       2009-11-20 14:47:39 from Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Union test case broken in make check? at 2009-11-19 21:21:43 from Emmanuel Cecchet

Responses

• Re: Union test case broken in make check? at 2009-11-19 23:39:14 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Eisentraut	2009-11-19 22:00:24	Re: PL/Python array support
Previous Message	Wojciech Knapik	2009-11-19 21:32:24	Re: Very bad FTS performance with the Polish config