From: | "Richard P(dot) Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Reko Turja <reko(dot)turja(at)liukuma(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and |
Date: | 2006-02-13 03:46:56 |
Message-ID: | 4B02067E-7202-47A7-9857-C465EFB33756@averillpark.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Feb 12, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Here is something about it, but nothing about Mattel getting it
> revoked:
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35226,00.html
>
> And the [2] link above points to:
>
> http://archives.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/03/28/cyberpatrol.mirrors/
>
> Not 100% certain how the FreeBSD folks intepreted this as 'legally
> revoked the entire distribution ..." though, I'm not too sure ...
ok, now i have enough to google on. i did find the followup to the wired
article here, which indicates that the judge's actual ruling was vague
and confusing:
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35258,00.html
and the following which suggests that parts of cphack were
not properly noticed as GPL:
http://www.topgold.com/training/webcourse/handouts/eff/cphack.html
so on the whole, i think that the lessons to be drawn from the
case may not be those that the freebsd.org authors want you to take
from it.
richard
--
Richard P. Welty
rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net 518-269-8232
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2006-02-13 16:52:19 | Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-02-13 03:28:27 | Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and |