| From: | "Valtonen, Hannu" <hannu(dot)valtonen(at)f-secure(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan Backson <juanbackson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp |
| Subject: | Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached |
| Date: | 2009-11-13 07:44:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4AFD0E63.6080308@f-secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/13/09 5:26 AM, Juan Backson wrote:
Hi,
I had a chat with Suzuki Hironobu (pgmemcached maintainer) earlier this
year and we pretty much decided that pgmemcache was the way to go after
which Suzuku wrote a large patch to make it also support libmemcached
behaviors and earlier PostgreSQL's.
So I'd recommend just going with pgmemcache.
- Hannu
ps. As a disclaimer, I'm the current pgmemcache maintainer, I've also
cc'd Suzuki san.
I'm the current maintainer of pgmemcache
> Hi,
> Have anyone tried pgmemcache and pgmemcached?
> What is the difference betweent he two? They are both non-persistent,
> so I have difficult time deciding which one to use.
> Any suggestion?
> Thanks,
> jb
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | silly8888 | 2009-11-13 07:47:53 | Re: Libpq binary mode SELECT ... WHERE ID IN ($1) Question |
| Previous Message | Mikko Partio | 2009-11-13 07:32:39 | Re: Postgres Clustering Options |