Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation
Date: 2009-10-13 05:38:00
Message-ID: 4AD41238.80100@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki-san,

> BEGIN;
> SET transaction_isolation = 'serializable';
> SET default_transaction_isolation = 'read committed';
> SHOW transaction_isolation;
> => serializable
> SHOW default_transaction_isolation;
> => read committed
> COMMIT;
> -- next transaction uses default_transaction_isolation
> SHOW transaction_isolation;
> => read committed

Thank you; that was very informative.

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-10-13 06:31:50 missing entry in GucSource_Names
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-10-13 05:28:44 Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation