Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Date: 2009-10-09 18:05:51
Message-ID: 4ACF7B7F.3040307@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> But at least for simple features I think that there would be a value
> in separating the patch author's work from the committer's adjustments.
>
>

That is just going to make life harder for committers.

There are plenty of things with my name on them that are not exactly
what I submitted. I think that's true of just about everybody. Mostly
things changed hae improved, but not always. I don't think we should be
too proprietary about patches. As far as I'm concerned, credit goes to
the submitter and blame if any to the committer.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-10-09 18:08:06 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-09 17:56:28 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1