From: | Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8(at)verizon(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Best suiting OS |
Date: | 2009-10-05 13:37:10 |
Message-ID: | 4AC9F686.1090403@verizon.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Robert Haas wrote (in part):
> Also, I'd just like to mention that vi is a much better editor than
> emacs.
>
That is not my impression. I have used vi from when it first came out (I
used ed before that) until about 1998 when I first installed Linux on one of
my machines and started using emacs. I find that for some tasks involving
global editing, that vi is a lot easier to use. But for most of the things I
do on a regular basis, if find emacs better. So, for me, it is not which is
the better editor, but which is the better editor for the task at hand.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 09:30:01 up 4 days, 18:29, 3 users, load average: 4.09, 4.07, 4.09
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Tauno Williams | 2009-10-05 13:38:50 | Re: Best suiting OS |
Previous Message | Nikolas Everett | 2009-10-05 13:30:55 | Re: Speed / Server |