ECPG dynamic cursorname patch revised and split Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: ECPG dynamic cursorname patch revised and split Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-10-03 05:24:32
Message-ID: 4AC6E010.2070803@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas írta:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Meskes írta:
>>
>>> It is accepted either way. I was just pointing out that it might be easier to
>>> review/commit at least parts of your patches if they can be applied seperately.
>>>
>>>
>> I have split up (and cleaned up a little) the dynamic
>> cursorname patch into smaller logical, easier-to-review
>> pieces. Descriptions below.
>>
>> ...
>> After every patch (except 4) both the core and ecpg
>> "make check" are successful.
>>
>
> It would've been nice if you'd changed the subject line before posting these.
>

At 3am, I forgot this. :(
I hope the archive threading doesn't break and
my previous mail will be referenced by this one.

> Also, please update commitfest.postgresql.org appropriately.
>

I just did, thanks for the reminder.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics

----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-10-03 06:27:31 Re: clang's static checker report.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-03 04:42:07 Re: Getting the red out (of the buildfarm)