Re: Best suiting OS

From: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best suiting OS
Date: 2009-10-02 19:15:21
Message-ID: 4AC65149.2030109@mark.mielke.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/02/2009 01:20 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I know I'm in the minority here, but I _always_ compile postgresql
> myself directly from official sources. It's easy enough and you never
> know when you have to do an emergency patch or cassert build, etc.
>

+1

I decided to do this as soon as I figured out that configuration options
(such as how datetime is stored - float vs integer) could change from
release to release. I much prefer to keep a stable PostgreSQL, and
upgrade the OS underneath it. It's been several years with this model,
and it's always been very simple to maintain. I recently documented the
instructions for another team and they fit within about 10 lines that
could be cut + pasted.

Cheers,
mark

--
Mark Mielke<mark(at)mielke(dot)cc>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-10-02 19:19:15 Re: Confusion on shared buffer
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-10-02 19:00:09 Re: Best suiting OS