From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Korbakov <m(dot)korbakov(at)postindustria(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planner question - wrong row count estimation |
Date: | 2009-09-21 21:20:33 |
Message-ID: | 4AB7EE21.5060108@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 9/19/09 5:08 PM, Michael Korbakov wrote:
> -> Hash Join (cost=8.50..25.11 rows=1
> width=28) (actual time=0.092..1.864 rows=560 loops=1)
> Hash Cond:
> (((partners_shares.year)::double precision = (shares.year)::double
> precision) AND ((partners_shares.month)::double precision =
> (shares.month)::double precision))
This appears to be where the estimates go wrong; Postgres may be
assuming random correlation which isn't correct.
My suggestion would be to try and create matching indexes on
date_trunc(daily_domain_reports.date) and month & year of
monthly_shares_with_parents_materialized.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alan McKay | 2009-09-21 21:27:48 | Re: statement stats extra load? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-09-21 21:19:29 | Re: statement stats extra load? |