Re: generic copy options

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-18 17:21:08
Message-ID: 4AB3C184.7020405@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/17/09 3:54 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Dan Colish wrote:
>
>> - Performance appears to be the same although I don't have a good
>> way for
>> testing this at the moment
>
> Here's what I do to generate simple COPY performance test cases:

Is there any reason to think that *this* copy patch will affect
performance at all?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-09-18 17:22:24 Re: Schedule for 8.5 Development
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-09-18 17:14:34 Draft for organized beta testing