Re: problems compiling postgres 8.3.7 on Solaris 10 64 bit with openssl

I'm curious if there are any thoughts on what I'm missing here. The 64
bit postgres runs just fine without openssl. As soon as I tie that in I
get headaches :/

Thanks!

u235sentinel wrote:
> John P Weatherman wrote:
>> It would also be helpful to know what your LD_LIBRARY_PATH looks like
>> and if you can do a 'find / -name libpq.so -print' to see where all the
>> copies of this library may reside.
>>
>>>
>>> Yeap, it's a fine place for it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sorry for the quick post but I was rushing during lunch and I can't
> get gmail to work from work. Blocked on our proxy apparently :-(
>
> Here is the LIBRARY_PATH
>
> # echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /usr/local/ssl98k/lib:/usr/lib/amd64:/usr/sfw/lib/64:/usr/local/lib:/usr/sfw/lib:/usr/openwin/lib
>
>
> I've switched it all around to hopefully help find stuff. And btw,
> the ssl98k is a new 64 build I put together. There were errors using
> the one that came with solaris... weird. I'll write it down if
> interested. I figured the latest build should resolve any problems.
> And btw, ssl98k works great by itself. Seems pretty stable.
>
> Here is how I run configure
>
> # ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/postgres CC="cc -m64
> -I/usr/local/ssl98k/include -L/usr/local/ssl98k/lib
> -I/usr/local/include" --with-openssl
>
> This runs fine however when I run make then try running pg_ctl (for
> example) here is the error I get
>
>
> /usr/local/postgres/bin/pg_ctl --help
> ld.so.1: pg_ctl: fatal: relocation error: R_AMD64_32: file
> /usr/local/postgres/lib/libpq.so.5: symbol (unknown): value
> 0xfffffd7fff1ccad0 does not fit
> Killed
>
> Thoughts on what I am doing wrong?
>
> And openssl is confirmed at 64 bit.
>
>
> # file openssl
> openssl: ELF 64-bit LSB executable AMD64 Version 1, dynamically
> linked, not stripped, no debugging information available
>
>
> I have this working just fine under 64 bit without openssl. It's very
> stable and all. But I do have a requirement to encrypt everything so
> I have to go this route.
>
> Thanks a bunch!!
>
>