Re: generic copy options

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Emmanuel Cecchet" <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Emmanuel Cecchet" <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-17 13:38:35
Message-ID: 4AB1F58B020000250002B2A0@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com> wrote:

> I just wonder how many users are using a single psql to manage
> multiple server instances of different older versions.

I do that, but I do try to keep all the active versions on my machine,
so that I can use one which exactly matches any of our 100 servers
when it matters. (Or I can ssh to the server and use its psql.)

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-09-17 13:45:32 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Joshua Tolley 2009-09-17 13:35:44 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL