| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Mohekey <scott(dot)mohekey(at)telogis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp to time_t |
| Date: | 2009-09-15 18:19:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4AAFDABE.3040508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> For less sane cases, I would point
> out to Codd that the current calendar system was not designed by
> mathematicians, and trying to superimpose strict mathematical rules on
> it just leads to nonsense (like the spec's requirements).
>
>
>
He's not listening ...
Strangely (or perhaps not), he stopped listening around the time I
started working on Postgres ...
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-09-15 18:31:48 | Re: WIP: generalized index constraints |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-15 18:18:17 | Re: syslog_line_prefix |