Re: Timestamp to time_t

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Mohekey <scott(dot)mohekey(at)telogis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Timestamp to time_t
Date: 2009-09-15 18:19:42
Message-ID: 4AAFDABE.3040508@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> For less sane cases, I would point
> out to Codd that the current calendar system was not designed by
> mathematicians, and trying to superimpose strict mathematical rules on
> it just leads to nonsense (like the spec's requirements).
>
>
>

He's not listening ...

Strangely (or perhaps not), he stopped listening around the time I
started working on Postgres ...

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-09-15 18:31:48 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-15 18:18:17 Re: syslog_line_prefix