| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09 |
| Date: | 2009-09-14 17:36:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4AAE7F37.4030402@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't think running that program going to fly for a production
>> quality integrated replication setup though. The UI admins are
>> going to want would allow querying this easily via a standard
>> database query. Most monitoring systems can issue psql queries but
>> not necessarily run a remote binary. I think that parts of
>> pg_controldata needs to get exposed via some number of built-in UDFs
>> instead, and whatever new internal state makes sense too. I could
>> help out writing those, if someone more familiar with the
>> replication internals can help me nail down a spec on what to watch.
>
> IMO, it would be best if the status could be sent via NOTIFY.
To where?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2009-09-14 17:39:11 | Re: clang's static checker report. |
| Previous Message | decibel | 2009-09-14 17:33:49 | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |