Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09
Date: 2009-09-14 16:06:30
Message-ID: 4AAE6A06.2070505@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith wrote:
> This is looking really neat now, making async replication really solid
> first before even trying to move on to sync is the right way to go
> here IMHO.

I agree with both of those sentiments.

One question I have is what is the level of traffic involved between the
master and the slave. I know numbers of people have found the traffic
involved in shipping of log files to be a pain, and thus we get things
like pglesslog.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-09-14 16:10:33 Re: [PATCH] 8.5 plpgsql change for named notation: treat word following AS keyword as label v3
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-09-14 16:05:24 Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09