From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, fulan Peng <fulanpeng(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |
Date: | 2009-09-12 23:30:09 |
Message-ID: | 4AAC2F01.3020803@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> So the question I would ask goes more like "do you really need 32K
> databases in one installation? Have you considered using schemas
> instead?" Databases are, by design, pretty heavyweight objects.
>
>
>
That's a fair question. OTOH, devising a scheme to get around it would
not be terribly difficult, would it? I can imagine a scheme where the
subdir for a database was lo/hi for some division of the database oid. I
guess it could make matters ugly for pg_migrator, though.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-13 01:34:09 | Re: pgsql: Add Unicode support in PL/Python PL/Python now accepts Unicode |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2009-09-12 23:21:13 | pgsql: plug dblink resource leak dblink generates orphaned connections |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-13 01:34:09 | Re: pgsql: Add Unicode support in PL/Python PL/Python now accepts Unicode |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-09-12 23:12:05 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Can not create more than 32766 databases in ufs file system. |