From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Luke Koops <luke(dot)koops(at)entrust(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5038: WAL file is pending deletion in pg_xlog folder, this interferes with WAL archiving. |
Date: | 2009-09-10 05:36:23 |
Message-ID: | 4AA89057.10806@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> No, it's a backend that's holding the file open, with FILE_SHARE_DELETE.
>
> If that's the only case we care about covering, then rename might be
> enough. I was just wondering what it would take to solve the more
> general problem of something holding it open with the wrong flags
> at the time we want to get rid of it.
Yes, that's a separate problem, and I think we should address that too.
That's what I thought was going on in OP's case at first, the patch I
posted in my first reply should address that.
I'll try to reproduce that case too, and verify that the patch fixes it.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-09-10 09:44:27 | Re: BUG #5038: WAL file is pending deletion in pg_xlog folder, this interferes with WAL archiving. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-10 01:18:50 | Re: need higher extra_float_digits value (3) |