From: | Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planner question - "bit" data types |
Date: | 2009-09-06 00:19:04 |
Message-ID: | 4AA2FFF8.6070806@denninger.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the other
one in my email system any more to follow up to it.
I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off. Ciao.
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Karl Denninger escribió:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
>>>
>> Yes I did. Go back and look at the archives. I provided full EXPLAIN
>> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query. Sheesh.
>>
>
> You did? Where? This is your first message in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
> No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
karl.vcf | text/x-vcard | 124 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-09-06 05:36:24 | Re: Planner question - "bit" data types |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-06 00:15:00 | Re: Planner question - "bit" data types |