Re: Planner question - "bit" data types

From: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date: 2009-09-06 00:19:04
Message-ID: 4AA2FFF8.6070806@denninger.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the other
one in my email system any more to follow up to it.

I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off. Ciao.

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Karl Denninger escribió:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
>>>
>> Yes I did. Go back and look at the archives. I provided full EXPLAIN
>> and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query. Sheesh.
>>
>
> You did? Where? This is your first message in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
> No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
karl.vcf text/x-vcard 124 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-09-06 05:36:24 Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-06 00:15:00 Re: Planner question - "bit" data types