Re: \d+ for long view definitions?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: \d+ for long view definitions?
Date: 2009-09-01 18:39:07
Message-ID: 4A9D23FB020000250002A7AC@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think we should always or never show the view definition, not
> sometimes.

+1

> And I also agree with Tom's point that we should fix the pager. The
> way that it works now is really annoying.

+1

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-09-01 18:41:31 Adding \ev view editor?
Previous Message Dave Huber 2009-09-01 18:35:04 Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error