From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pretty print viewdefs |
Date: | 2009-08-26 23:12:42 |
Message-ID: | 4A95C16A.6090706@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> I do have a solution that wraps when running line length over 80 instead
>> of on every col:
>>
>
>
>> SELECT sh.shoename, sh.sh_avail, sh.slcolor, sh.slminlen,
>> sh.slminlen * un.un_fact AS slminlen_cm, sh.slmaxlen,
>> sh.slmaxlen * un.un_fact AS slmaxlen_cm, sh.slunit
>> FROM shoe_data sh, unit un
>> WHERE sh.slunit = un.un_name;
>>
>
>
>> It's not a huge amount of code.
>>
>
> Well, let's see it? What do you do with expressions that don't fit?
>
See attached.
We don't apply the wrapping unless there has been a column printed on
the line (except for the SELECT line).
So we can run over the limit on a line, but if we do there's only one
column spec. I think that's acceptable.
>
>> Maybe we need a couple of extra pg_get_viewdef() variants. One to wrap
>> on some provided line length, one to wrap on every column. psql could
>> use the first, pg_dump could use the second.
>>
>
> pg_dump doesn't use prettyprinting at all, and won't if I have anything
> to say about it. But I could see teaching the psql \d views to pass
> along whatever psql thinks the window width is.
>
>
>
OK, but I'd still like to have the only one col per line variant available.
cheers
andrew
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
prettyprint.patch | text/x-patch | 2.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-26 23:25:44 | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-26 22:55:21 | Re: pretty print viewdefs |