From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-24 17:48:37 |
Message-ID: | 4A92D275.5070008@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
> Yeah, conference-based releases is just a proxy for time-based
> releases. It's nice to have something to be happy about at the
> conference too. And it's a convenient time to start talking about the
> next release when you're all face-to-face.
On the one hand:
I'd say that we go for the 3-CF release. I think we need to prove that
we can do a time-based release once before a lot of people on this list
will believe in it.
If we do 4 CFs, we're in danger of still being in beta in late May ...
and once conference and vacation season start, things get a lot slower.
Mind you, it's possible that we can shorten the final CF and beta this
time, but I wouldn't want to count on it.
If we *can* shorten them, then 8.6 can have 4CFs. But we won't know
until after we've done it.
On the other hand:
I think if we do another release without Standby/replication, we'll
start to lose a lot of users. People are waiting on that, and a lot of
folks were expecting it in 8.4.
Therefore: I think, 3CFs, but we go all-out to get Standby/Replication
into 8.5 in the next month. So, every committer/major hacker on this
list should pitch in to get those features done.
So, is there someone here who could be helping with HS/SR and isn't?
Why not?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-24 17:50:07 | Re: hba load error and silent mode |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-08-24 17:47:42 | Re: Slaying the HYPOTamus |