From: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Adnan DURSUN <a_dursun(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ODBC driver & connection limit |
Date: | 2009-08-24 11:02:33 |
Message-ID: | 4A927349.5030602@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Adnan DURSUN wrote:
>
> After which version of psqlODBC driver the limitation was removed ?
8.2.5(or 8.2.4.02).
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
> Regards,
> Adnan DURSUN
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
> To: "Adnan DURSUN" <a_dursun(at)hotmail(dot)com>
> Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 12:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC driver & connection limit
>
>
>> Adnan DURSUN wrote:
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>>> To: "Adnan DURSUN" <a_dursun(at)hotmail(dot)com>
>>>> Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC driver & connection limit
>>>
>>>
>>>> As far as I know, the ODBC driver does not specify any limits.
>>>> However, the postgresql server does.
>>>
>>> But the psqlodbc.h file has the following line ;
>>> #define MAX_CONNECTIONS 128 /* conns per environment * (arbitrary) */
>>> What does that mean ?
>>
>> Once the connection limit was 128 but the current driver doesn't
>> have the limitation.
>>
>> regards,
>> Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Goodman | 2009-08-24 14:17:28 | Re: Problem with the read only clause for read only cursors |
Previous Message | Andrus Moor | 2009-08-24 08:30:40 | 08.04.0100 truncates bytea fields |